“…..free vacs….resulted in almost a 20 percent increase…. That RR is not sucking away profits. Seems RR always condemns any idea the SS AND IBA industry tries.”
To the contrary, my contributions and writings over the last several years on self-service have been focused on improvement and self-help.
I have always been a proponent of free vacuum as long as it can be done properly.
The issue with offering free vacuum at self-service is it just isn’t enough.
20 percent increase in what? Was this 20 percent increase for a growing or mature business or one with declining sales?
For example, if the wash had lost 40 market value, and you increase sales by 20 percent, you are still behind the 8-ball.
What is benefit/cost and ROI of free vacuum where cost equal loss of vacuum revenue (opportunity cost) and improvements on land (accounting cost)?
“……I changed my full service wash to an express….with free vacuums…. My self service lost 50-60 % of business. Vacuum revenue down 60-70%.”
Consider cause and effect. Traffic count doesn’t make carwash count fluctuate, people do.
Likewise, express doesn’t cause self-service vacuum revenue to drop, wand customers do.
Quite frankly, giving away vacuum to wand customers at this point wouldn’t make any sense.
Consider self-service that wants to offer unlimited.
The drop average revenue per car (net site sales) from implementing program is often $2.50 or more. Express format has excess capacity to make this up in volume, in-bay does not.
Arguably, this suggests an objective strategy and tactics and not poking at the threat with a stick. The point I was trying to make.